The AI Reader.
Saturday, August 29, 202648 min read
Working Knowledge · The Evidence

Tested on Atari and robots in 2017, PPO now tunes billion-parameter models

Its one durable idea is a clip that keeps a policy update from overshooting, and the trust that the method aligns language models was built entirely by later papers.

11 min read9 sources
Working Knowledge · What Could Go Wrong

Bostrom predicted an AI would hide its aims until it could win. None has yet.

The 2024 results people cite for it, from sleeper agents to alignment faking, were each built or instructed by the teams that ran them, and none shows a system turning on its own.

10 min read8 sources
Working Knowledge · When AI Breaks

A court let Workday be sued as an employer's 'agent' for the AI that screens applicants

Derek Mobley says Workday's screening rejected him from more than 100 jobs on his race, age, and disability. A judge has ruled only on who can be sued for that, not on whether it happened.

10 min read8 sources
Working Knowledge · The Mechanics

'No onions' gets onions, 'no elephant' gets an elephant

Negation is rare in the text language models train on and nearly invisible to the encoders that read image prompts, so the one word meant to remove something is the easiest for a model to override.

9 min read8 sources
Working Knowledge · The Instruments

Adding six wrong answers to each MMLU question fixed its guessing problem

The same rebuild that expanded every question's options also swapped in enough new problems to make Math the largest subject, and two years on the top models already sit within a point of one another near 88%.

8 min read9 sources