The AI Reader.
Monday, July 27, 202649 min read
Working Knowledge · The Instruments

A passing contamination check on GSM8K would not catch a renamed problem

GSM8K's training set went into GPT-4's pretraining before the model scored 92 percent on the test, and a separate study shows that renaming a problem's numbers alone still moves a model's score.

11 min read8 sources
Working Knowledge · The Evidence

BERT's near-human score on a reasoning test collapsed once the shortcut was closed

Devlin, Chang, Lee and Toutanova's 2018 model set new marks on eleven language tasks by training on masked words instead of the next one. One of its most human-looking scores, though, traced to a handful of words a benchmark let it exploit, not the argument the task was built to test.

10 min read10 sources
Working Knowledge · What Could Go Wrong

No AI has to go rogue for humans to lose control

Its authors admit they can't yet show how the loop closes, and the starkest real cases so far, two automated Dutch systems, ended with a court striking one down and a cabinet falling over the other.

10 min read12 sources
Working Knowledge · The Mechanics

A model's weights freeze the moment its training run ends

Everything a chatbot seems to learn afterward, from a correction to a live search result, arrives through the prompt: its weights were never touched again once training ended.

9 min read9 sources
Working Knowledge · When AI Breaks

IBM trained Watson for Oncology on hypothetical patients, then sold it worldwide

Its own internal reviewers called the results unsafe and incorrect, and the same slide decks weighed the business risk of finally testing them.

9 min read16 sources